Kashmir Conflict

In the 1965 war, I would say Pakistan wrongly assessed the possibility of an Indian Counter Offensive on the International Border.

People often misplace Operation Gibraltar as the Primary Objective for Pakistan in the 1965 war, which in my view was the primary mission. But in the war the objectives were different. We can say that operation Gibraltar was wrongly planned and executed, according to the portrayals and media propaganda there is no second opinion in that. But during the war the primary and major objective for India was different than just suppressing a movement in Indian Occupied Kashmir.

Now, we have come to a discussion where we cannot leave the Kashmir Conflict out of the scenario. The freedom struggle or the wrongly labelled Pakistani sponsored terrorism (whatever you may call it) was not over at that point, it is still very much at large till now, and as far as the policies go, it will remain just like this till at least the next few decades.

If we take on the subject of Pakistani Infiltration in Kashmir, there is a very strong argument in the mass media horizons that support Indian viewpoint in this regard. However, I am entirely against it, and I truly endorse the Pakistani Offensive Strategy in Kashmir, and I have strong reasons to backup my premise.

1. If Pakistan doesn't support the Kashmir Movement, then they have to entirely withdraw their claim of Kashmir.

2. It is in Pakistani Interest to claim Kashmir as part of their land due to its abundant resources, geographical prospective, all our waters come from there, economical prospects, agriculture, tourism, two nation theory and many more.

3. If Kashmir is not a disputed territory and it belongs to India, then Pakistan will rely on India for Water, electricity and all the major amenities that depend on them (which means pretty much everything)

4. In partition every Riyasat had a right to choose which side they want to go, Kashmir's ruler annexed it to India, however, Junagarh was annexed to Pakistan, Hyderabad was a free state. Now India claims that Kashmir was annexed to them that is why they have a right to it. What about the rights of Junagarh and Hyderabad.

5. I know many people from Azad Kashmir, who tell me the stories of their fighting with Indian Forces in 1948. This was the time when Azad Kashmir became a part of Pakistan. And those brave people gave their lives while fighting with stones against the Indian Army - Don't they deserve freedom.

If Pakistani support of Kashmir Movement is wrong, then what claim do India have on Baluchistan to fund their movement, it is always the main mission of India to fund the very few people who are against the creation of Pakistan, be it Bangladesh, Baluchistan, Gilgit Baltistan, Sindh, or anti Pakistan sentiment in Afghanistan. They just try to find and fund a few hundred people in these areas and use them in their massive destabilizing campaign against Pakistan. Results of this campaign can be seen over the Internet and News outlets, there is a massive anti Pakistan sentiment if you search on keywords like Baluchistan Conflict. 

I think that anyone who doesn't support the Kashmir Movement is not a patriot, and these days, I am really fed up of the pseudo-intellectual liberal unpatriotic mourning that has taken root in the brains of many Pakistanis.

And believe me this is called mass brainwashing, and India is very successful in doing it to us Pakistanis.